Former Uk Security Service Head Says Weakening Encryption Would Be Too Dangerous

While Apple may have given in to demands from the Chinese government to remove VPN apps from its app store there, it does generally take a strong stand on encryption. It uses end-to-end encryption for both iMessage and FaceTime, and resisted pressure from the FBI to create a weakened version of iOS, describing it as too dangerous.

We’ve written a number of pieces explaining why we support Apple’s stance, both before and after the San Bernardino case.

The British government wants to ban end-to-end encryption altogether, arguing that it hampers the work of the security services. Support for Apple’s position – and opposition to that of the British Home Secretary – has now come from an unlikely source …

In a BBC Radio 4 interview cited by Gizmodo, the former head of the Security Service (more commonly known as MI5) has said that while strong encryption does make their job harder, it is the lesser evil. Jonathan Evans said:

MI5 is responsible for domestic counter-intelligence and security. Evans was Director-General of MI5 until 2013.

Evans also spoke about the risk of unsecured Internet of Things devices.

Apple HomeKit certification requires extremely strong encryption for devices to be approved.

VPN apps encrypt traffic between a user and the server, ensuring that not even your ISP can see which sites you are visiting or what you are doing there. It is, however, important to choose one that doesn’t keep logs to ensure that it is not doing its own snooping.